Evaluation of Officer Development Program Training

Main Article Content

Nisa Ardini
Universitas Pelita Harapan, Tangerang, Banten, Indonesia
Samuel Lukas
Universitas Pelita Harapan, Tangerang, Banten, Indonesia

The previous research indicates that the evaluation of training programs has not addressed the performance aspects of each participant. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the Officer Development Program (ODP) training using the Kirkpatrick model at the reaction level (training satisfaction), learning (learning outcomes), and behavior. To address this research objective, the research method used in this study is a mixed-method approach. Several instruments, such as questionnaires, tests, and interviews, were employed to gather information. The research subjects were seven ODP participants. The results of the evaluation at the reaction level show that overall, ODP participants are quite satisfied with the onsite training. At the learning level, out of the seven ODP participants, one scored below 60. At the behavior level, all ODP participants did not complete 100% of the required tasks in each department. However, all ODP participants not exhibited behavior in line with the indicators required. From the evaluation results, it can be concluded that the training evaluation for ODP (Officer Development Program) has not been effective in achieving the program's goals. Recommendations for the training program include modifying the learning model to enhance adaptability, resilience, job management, and problem-solving skills.


Keywords: Kirkpatrick, Evaluation, Training, Formative, Summative
Almomani, Emad, Sullivan, Jacqueline, Saadeh, Omar, Mustafa, Emad, Pattison, Natalie, & Alinier, Guillaume. (2023). Reflective learning conversations model for simulation debriefing: a co-design process and development innovation. BMC Medical Education, 23(1), 837.
Arrogante, Oscar, González-Romero, Gracia María, López-Torre, Eva María, Carrión-García, Laura, & Polo, Alberto. (2021). Comparing formative and summative simulation-based assessment in undergraduate nursing students: nursing competency acquisition and clinical simulation satisfaction. BMC Nursing, 20(1), 1–11.
Benziane, Roucham, & Houcine, Mahmoudi. (2021). The evaluation effectiveness of training in the energy sector by Kirkpatrick model: Case of Algerian companies in Bechar area. Journal of Economic Growth, 8(4), 1–8.
Bin Mubayrik, Haifa F. (2020). New trends in formative-summative evaluations for adult education. Sage Open, 10(3), 2158244020941006.
Boller, Sharon, & Fletcher, Laura. (2020). Design thinking for training and development: Creating learning journeys that get results. Association for Talent Development.
Cahapay, Michael. (2021). Kirkpatrick model: Its limitations as used in higher education evaluation. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 8(1), 135–144.
Elwy, A. Rani, Wasan, Ajay D., Gillman, Andrea G., Johnston, Kelly L., Dodds, Nathan, McFarland, Christine, & Greco, Carol M. (2020). Using formative evaluation methods to improve clinical implementation efforts: Description and an example. Psychiatry Research, 283, 112532.
Hasen, Seng. "Investigasi Teknik Wawancara dalam Penelitian Kualitatif Manajemen Konstruksi." Jurnal Teknik Sipil ITB 7, no. 3 (Desember 2020): 283 - 293.
Herlina, Vivi. Panduan Praktis Mengolah Data Kuesioner Menggunakan SPSS. Jakarta: Elex Media Komputindo, 2019.
Hill, Lilian Helen, ed. Assessment, Evaluation, and Accountability in Adult Education. New York: Stylus Publishing, LLC, 2020.
Hira, Avneet, & Anderson, Emma. (2021). Motivating online learning through project-based learning during the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic. IAFOR Journal of Education, 9(2), 93–110.
Iskandar, Azwar. (2019). Evaluasi Diklat ASN Model Kirkpatrick (Studi Kasus Pelatihan Effective Negotiation Skill Balai Diklat Keuangan Makassar)(Kirkpatrick Evaluation Model On Civil Servant Training (Case Study Of Financial Educatioan And Training Agency Of Makassar)). Jurnal Pendidikan, 20, 18–39.
Kirkpatrick, James D., & Kirkpatrick, Wendy Kayser. (2016). Kirkpatrick’s four levels of training evaluation. Association for Talent Development.
Kusumastuti, Adhi, & Khoiron, Ahmad Mustamil. (2019). Metode penelitian kualitatif. Lembaga Pendidikan Sukarno Pressindo (LPSP).
Matondang, Zulkifli, & Djulia, Ely. (2019). Sriadhi, dan Janner Simarmata. Evaluasi Hasil Belajar. Medan: Yayasan Kita Menulis.
Suwarto. "Tes adalah instrumen yang dibuat dengan baik yang, secara total, mengukur hasil belajar yang realistis yang mewakili ciri-ciri perilaku yang diharapkan." Jurnal Pendidikan 31, no. 1, 2022.
Vongsachang, Hurnan, Schneberk, Todd, Sprunt, Laura, Padilla, Gabe, & Riddell, Jeff. (2023). The Impact of an Experiential Social Medicine Curriculum in an Emergency Medicine Residency Training Program: Mixed-methods Curricular Evaluation. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, 24(1), 83.