Perjanjian Koeksistensi Merek dan Letter of Consent terhadap Merek yang Memiliki Unsur Persamaan pada Pokoknya
Main Article Content
A trademark serves as the identity of a product and/or service, representing the quality and reputation associated with it. In the process of trademark registration, it is inevitable that several trademarks may bear similarities and are at risk of rejection by the Directorate General of Intellectual Property (DGIP). To address this issue, some strategies include the establishment of Trademark Coexistence Agreements or Letters of Consent (LOC). This research aims to explore the roles of Trademark Coexistence Agreements and LOCs in overcoming the challenges of registering trademarks that share similarities. The methodology employed is normative legal research, involving analysis of relevant legislation and secondary data from related literature. The findings indicate that both Trademark Coexistence Agreements and LOCs can assist trademark owners in reaching agreements regarding the use of similar trademarks. However, the application of these instruments in Indonesia has not been explicitly regulated. The conclusion of this study underscores the necessity for clearer legislative policies and support for the practice of utilizing Trademark Coexistence Agreements and LOCs to streamline the trademark registration process and promote innovation in the market.
Deng, M., & Yu, N. (2017). Trademark Coexistence or Trademark Confusion? A Comparative Study from Perspectives of Europe and China. Сhina Patents & Trademarks, 4, 74.
Farisi, S. (2018). Pengaruh citra merek dan kualitas produk terhadap kepuFarisi, Salman. (2018). Pengaruh citra merek dan kualitas produk terhadap keputusan pembelian sepatu Adidas pada mahasiswa Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara. The National Conference on Management.
Hafsari, Y. M. (2021). Hak Atas Kekayaan Intelektual, Hak Merek, Rahasia Dagang, Dan Pelanggaran Hak Merek Dan Rahasia Dagang Serta Hak Patent (Literatur Review Artikel. Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen Terapan, 2(6), 733–743.
Listiana, Y. R. (2021). Dampak Globalisasi Terhadap Karakter Peserta Didik dan Kualitas Pendidikan di Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 5(1), 1544–1550.
Mardiana, N. R. (2019). Analisa Pengaruh Brand Ambassador, Citra Merek Dan Kualitas Produk Terhadap Minat Beli Produk Kosmetik Emina. Jurnal Online Internasional & Nasional Vol. 7 No.1, Januari – Juni 2019 Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Jakarta, 53(9), 1689–1699.
Masmuddin, R. (2018). Pengaruh Kredibilitas Selebriti Endorser Pada Sikap Terhadap Iklan, Sikap Terhadap Merek, dan Niat Beli: Studi pada Kosmetik Merek Wardah. Jurnal Managemen Dan Bisnis Visioner, 7(02), 1320–1330.
Nugroho, E. R. (2021). Penyusunan Kontrak: Kontrak Konvensional dan Syariah di Bawah Tangan. Jakarta: Rajagrafindo Persada.
Pahusa, D. (2015). Similarity of Main Substaces in a famous Brand (Supreme Court Decision Number 162 K/Pdt. Sus-HKI/2014). Criteria to determine. JURNAL CITA HUKUM-INDONESIAN LAW JOURNAL, 3(1), 169–194. https://doi.org/10.23920/acta.v5i1.486.
Pamungkas, C. (2017). Global village dan Globalisasi dalam Konteks ke-Indonesiaan. Jurnal Global & Strategis, 9(2), 245.
Priambodo, E. (2022). Sentra Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Aspek Budaya Mutu Perguruan Tinggi di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Gema, 34(01), 28–37.
Putri, S. C. I., Setlight, M. M. M., & Gerungan, A. E. (2023). Prinsip First to File dalam Pendaftaran Merek Dagang di Indonesia. Lex Privatum, 11(4).
Ramli, S. (2014). Menjaga Nilai-Nilai Religius dalam Adat dan Budaya Melayu Jambi Di Era Globalisasi. Supian.
Syadiyah, T. N., & Jumino, J. (2020). Arsip Sebagai Dokumen Pendukung Untuk Pengajuan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Batik Pekalongan. Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan, 8(2), 189–198.
Zhong, Y., & Huang, Q. (2022). Determination of Relevant Public Confusion in Trademark Reverse Confusion. Science of Law Journal, 1(3), 22–32.
