Menguji Batas Business Judgement Rule: Studi Kasus Pengembangan Bisnis Lng PT Pertamina di Amerika Serikat
Main Article Content
Business decisions made by the directors of a company are often the subject of legal interpretation, especially when the decision results in losses to the company or the state. This research focuses on the application of the Business Judgement Rule (BJR) principle in the case of LNG business development by PT Pertamina in the United States involving Karen Agustiawan as President Director. Through a normative juridical approach and qualitative analysis, this study evaluates the extent to which the BJR can protect the board of directors from lawsuits as well as identify the factors that cause the decision not to be protected by the BJR principle. The results of the analysis show that the application of BJR cannot provide legal protection if the business decision is not based on good faith, prudence, and without conflict of interest. In this context, the study also discusses the application of progressive legal theory as an alternative framework for handling this kind of case. The study recommends strengthening regulations to set limits on BJR implementation and ensure transparency in the business decision-making process.
Ardhyansah, R. F. (2020). Penyidikan In Absentia dalam Penanganan Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia (Sebuah Alternatif Penerapan Asas Peradilan Cepat). Jurnal Idea Hukum, 6(1).
Hadi, S., Suryamah, A., & Afriana, A. (2021). Prinsip Business Judgement Rule Dalam Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Direksi Bumn Yang Melakukan Tindakan Investasi Yang Mengakibatkan Kerugian. ACTA DIURNAL Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kenotariatan, 4(2), 171–190.
Hasan, N. R., & Indriyati, R. (2020). Optimalisasi Penerapan Prosedur Keselamatan Kerja di PT. Pertamina (Persero) Ru-VI Balongan. Majalah Ilmiah Gema Maritim, 22(1), 49–59.
Januarsyah, M. P. Z., Priyatno, D., Winata, A. S., & Hidayat, K. (2022). Penerapan Doktrin Business Judgment Rule Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi Karen Agustiawan. Jurnal Ius Constituendum, 7(1), 143.
Mahmud, A. (2021). Pengembalian Aset Tindak Pidana Korupsi: Pendekatan Hukum Progresif. Sinar Grafika (Bumi Aksara).
Muninggar, R. A., & Saleh, R. (2024). Perbandingan Sistem Hukum Indonesia dan Australia Tentang Pengaturan Pertimbangan Bisnis (Business Judgement). UNES Law Review, 6(3), 9104–9113.
Mustafiddin, A. S., Jaya, F. A., & Susiana, L. (2023). Analisis Yuridis Penjatuhan Pidana Terhadap Korporasi yang Melakukan Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Surabaya Nomor 95/Pid. Sus-TPK/2019/PN Sby). Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains, 6(1), 79–89.
Prayoga, T. I., Isima, N., & Ibrahim, S. (2023). Potensi Sistem Hukum Ekonomi Syariah dalam Pencegahan Korupsi Wujudkan Integritas Sektor Ekonomi. Al-’Aqdu: Journal of Islamic Economics Law, 3(2), 135–142.
Pujihartini, L. (2022). Penanggulangan Korupsi , Kolusi Dan Nepotiseme. 02(02), 256–259.
Rahmad, N., & Hafis, W. (2020). Hukum Progresif dan Relevansinya Pada Penalaran Hukum di Indonesia. El-Ahli: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam, 1(2), 34–50.
Salenda, K. (2022). Penerapan prinsip Business Judgment Rule (BJR) terhadap Putusan Direksi Perusahaan Perseroan Terbatas. Alauddin Law Development Journal, 4(3), 503–519.
Sianturi, M. (2022). Analisis Viktimologi Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pencurian Kendaraan Di Tanjungpinang Kepulauan Riau. Diktum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 10(1), 91–102. https://doi.org/10.24905/diktum.v10i1.202.
Yakub, M., & Phuspa, S. M. (2019). Manajemen risiko kebakaran pada pt pertamina ep asset 4 field sukowati. Journal of Industrial Hygiene and Occupational Health, 3(2).
