Analisa Prosedur Tembakan Peringatan terhadap Keselamatan Petugas dan Publik
Main Article Content
This study aims to analyze the warning firing procedure in the context of law enforcement in Indonesia, especially its impact on the safety of officers and the public. Warning shots are a form of use of non-lethal force regulated in Perkap No. 1 of 2009. While the goal is to mitigate the threat, the procedure often presents risks, such as the psychological impact on the suspect and the potential danger of falling bullets. The research method used is a qualitative-descriptive approach, with literature review and case study analysis of several incidents in Indonesia, including the panic incident in Bekasi. The results showed that while warning shots are effective in some situations to stop threats, they can also trigger unexpected responses such as panic that threaten public safety. In addition, the implementation of this policy is highly dependent on the understanding and discretion of officers in the field. This study recommends the use of non-lethal tools such as Taser and the application of de-escalation methods to reduce the risk. Intensive training for officers is also needed to improve decision-making abilities in emergency situations. The findings of this study are expected to be the basis for perfecting the policy on the use of force by the National Police to improve the safety of officers and the public.
Ariyanti, V. (2019). Kebijakan Penegakan Hukum Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia. Jurnal Yuridis, 6(2), 33–54.
Budiarta, G., Lemes, I. N., & Mandala, S. (2021). Pelaksanaan Kode Etik Profesi Terhadap Anggota Kepolisian Republik Indonesia Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2002 Tentang Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia Dalam Mencegah Penyalahgunaan Wewenang Dalam Penegakan Hukum Di Kepolisian Resor Buleleng. Kertha Widya, 9(1), 73–98.
Hirschfield, P. J. (2023). Exceptionally lethal: American police killings in a comparative perspective. Annual Review of Criminology, 6(1), 471–498.
Jufri, M. (2023). Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia; Dasar Teori Dan Praktiknya. Depok: Rajawali Pers.
Moento, P. A., Wuniyu, F., & Betaubun, W. L. (2020). Politik Keamanan dalam Penyelesaian Konflik Sosial Di Papua. Jurnal Noken (Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial), 6(1).
Pandelaki, G. R. (2018). Peran Polisi Dalam Pengendalian Massa Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2002 Tentang Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia. Lex Et Societatis, 6(5).
Putra, A. (2022). Interpretasi Hak Asasi Manusia Dalam Ideologi Pancasila Dan Implikasinya Terhadap Persatuan Dan Kesatuan Di Indonesia. JURNAL HAM, 13. https://doi.org/10.30641/ham.2022.13. 1-14
Paul, T. K. (2022). It Is Time to End" Warning Shots". Journal of Palliative Medicine, 25(11), 1618-1618.
Rahardjo, S. R. (2023). Penyelesaian sengketa terkait penggunaan gas air mata di dalam stadion Kanjuruhan oleh Aparat Kepolisian menurut pasal 5 peraturan kapolri nomor 1 tahun 2009 Perspektif Maqashid Syariah. Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana malik Ibrahim.
Saharuddin, S. (2017). Strategi Penegakan Hukum Disiplin Anggota Polri sebagai Perwujudan untuk Mencapai Pemerintahan yang Baik dan Bersih. Al Hikam, 1(2), 75–91.
Sukarnita, P. H., & Surata, I. N. (2021). Peranan Profesi dan Pengamanan Dalam Penegakan Kode Etik Kepolisian Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2002 Tentang Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia Di Kepolisian Resor Buleleng. Kertha Widya, 8(1), 38–66.
Susilo, D. K., Azed, A. B., & Sarbaini, S. (2021). Analisa Tembak Di Tempat Yang Dilakukan Oleh Anggota Polisi Terhadap Pelaku Kriminal Dalam Upaya Penegakan Hukum Pidana. Legalitas: Jurnal Hukum, 13(2), 222–236.
Sierra-Arévalo, M. (2021). American policing and the danger imperative. Law & Society Review, 55(1), 70-103.
Waluyo, B. (2017). Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia, Cetakan Kedua. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Yamane, D. (2022). Gun culture 2.0: The evolution and contours of defensive gun ownership in America. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 704(1), 20-43.
