Kurikulum Matematika Australia: Tinjauan Sistematis tentang Konteks, Konten dan Proses
Main Article Content
This research aims to provide a systematic review of the Australian Mathematics Curriculum with a focus on its context, content and implementation process, and evaluate its relevance in global mathematics education. Through a literature review approach, this study collected and analyzed relevant literature on curriculum development, teaching strategies and challenges in the implementation of the Australian Mathematics Curriculum, comparing it with curricula in other countries. The research method used is a literature review, by examining academic sources including journal articles, books, research reports from the last 10 years, and official documents related to the mathematics curriculum in Australia and other countries. The data collected was then thematically analyzed to identify strengths and weaknesses in the curriculum approach, and to relate the findings to the global context. The results showed that. 1) context description; The Australian Mathematics Curriculum is driven by an inclusive and competency-based national education policy, with an emphasis on developing critical thinking skills, problem solving, and the use of technology in learning. 2) Description of curriculum content includes three main strands: Number and Algebra, Measurement and Geometry, and Statistics and Probability, which are designed to provide a comprehensive understanding of mathematics, with a progressive and graduated approach from primary to secondary levels. 3) Process Description; the implementation of the curriculum involved inquiry-based teaching, problem solving, and technology integration, despite facing challenges related to teacher training, infrastructure, and access gaps in rural and remote areas.
Australia. (2015). Assessment and Reporting Authority, Australian Curriculum. Autralian Curriculum. http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/mathematics/%0Acurriculum/f-10?layout=1
Australian. (2015a). Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). December, 1–16. https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/media/3680/mathematics_-_sequence_of_content.pdf
Arslan, B., & Finn, B. (2023). The Effects of Personalized Nudges on Cognitively Disengaged Student Behavior in Low-Stakes Assessments. Journal of Intelligence, 11(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11110204
Blannin, J., Redmond, P., McLeod, A., & Mayne, F. (2022). Positioning the technologies curriculum: a snapshot of Australian initial teacher education programs. The Australian Educational Researcher, 49(5), 979–999. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-021-00473-5
Bone, E. K., & Ross, P. M. (2021). Rational curriculum processes: revising learning outcomes is essential yet insufficient for a twenty-first century science curriculum. Studies in Higher Education, 46(2), 394–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1637845
Callingham, R., Watson, J., & Oates, G. (2021). Learning progressions and the Australian curriculum mathematics: The case of statistics and probability. Australian Journal of Education, 65(3), 329–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/00049441211036521
Clayton, S. (2021). Australian and International Journal of Rural Education Rural Implementation of Girls’ Programming Network (GPN). 34(2), 113–124.
Falloon, G., Powling, M., Fraser, S., & Hatisaru, V. (2022). Shaping science, technology, engineering and mathematics curriculum in Australian schools: An ecological systems analysis. Australian Journal of Education, 66(2), 171–195. https://doi.org/10.1177/00049441221083347
Fischer, J., Bearman, M., Boud, D., & Tai, J. (2024). How does assessment drive learning? A focus on students’ development of evaluative judgement. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 49(2), 233–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2023.2206986
Harrison, N., Tennent, C., Vass, G., Guenther, J., Lowe, K., & Moodie, N. (2019). Curriculum and learning in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander education: A systematic review. The Australian Educational Researcher, 46(2), 233–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-019-00311-9
Ismail, S. M., Rahul, D. R., Patra, I., & Rezvani, E. (2022). Formative vs. summative assessment: impacts on academic motivation, attitude toward learning, test anxiety, and self-regulation skill. Language Testing in Asia, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-022-00191-4
Loyens, S. M. M., van Meerten, J. E., Schaap, L., & Wijnia, L. (2023). Situating Higher-Order, Critical, and Critical-Analytic Thinking in Problem- and Project-Based Learning Environments: A Systematic Review. In Educational Psychology Review (Vol. 35, Issue 2). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09757-x
Murphy, S. (2022). Mathematics success against the odds: the case of a low socioeconomic status, rural Australian school with sustained high mathematics performance. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 34(4), 767–787. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-020-00361-8
Pambudi, R., Afghohani, A., & Farahsanti, I. (2019). Pengaruh Media Video Youtube Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Matematika Pada Siswa Kelas X SMK Negeri 2 Sukoharjo Tahun Ajaran 2017/2018. Jurnal Pendidikan, 28(2), 175–182.
Sandri, D., & Tisnawati, T. (2023). ANALISIS Faktor Rendahnya Minat Belajar Siswa Kelas Ix Pada Mata Pelajaran Matematika. Inspirasi Dunia: Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Dan Bahasa, 2(1), 175–185.
Smith, E. (2022). Australian TVET Teacher Training: Once Flourishing but Now Neglected. Technical and Vocational Education and Training, 34(January), 435–451. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6474-8_26
O’Keeffe, P. (2024). Economic Inequality and the ‘Cost of Living’ Crisis BT - Power, Privilege and Place in Australian Society (P. O’Keeffe, Ed.; pp. 101–126). Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-1144-4_5
Pasichnyk, N., & Rizhniak, R. (2023). Solving School Problems of Integrative Content: Mathematics and Economics. Academic Notes Series Pedagogical Science, 1. https://doi.org/10.36550/2415-7988-2023-1-208-43-50
