Corruption is a serious threat to the integrity and effectiveness of law enforcement institutions, including district courts. In this context, this article aims to examine the journey of anti-corruption reform in district court institutions, with a focus on efforts to improve internal integrity and reduce corrupt practices involving district court personnel. This research aims to track the development and efforts of anti-corruption reform within the district courts, as well as identifying the factors that influence the success or failure of these reforms. This article is descriptive research using qualitative methods. The main data sources are interviews with district court officials and related stakeholders. In his role as a judge at the Rangkasbitung Class II District Court, integrity and fairness in the judicial system are highly upheld, especially amidst the rise of unscrupulous individuals and mafias in the judiciary. The Supreme Court's big mission is to create a great judiciary through accreditation programs, integrity zones, and efforts to fight corruption. Crime involves various elements, from investigation to trial. The accelerated case resolution program and transparent public services are innovations of the Supreme Court. In an era of uncertainty and public distrust of law enforcement, justice becomes subjective and cannot always meet the expectations of all parties. Improving quality and accelerating case resolution is the focus, while ensuring quality decisions. A quality court representative is important and something to be proud of. Justice remains relative and cannot be measured consistently for each individual.