Analisis Sentimen Publik pada Tagar #KawalPutusanMK di Media Sosial X
Main Article Content
The background of this study is that various sentiments around the community began to emerge due to the hashtag that recently appeared on social media X (Twitter), namely the hashtag of the #KawalPutusanMK movement that emerged as a form of public resistance to the efforts of the House of Representatives (DPR) to change the decision of the Constitutional Court (MK) related to the 2024 Regional Elections. The movement sparked various controversies among the public, academics, politicians, and political observers. Although many support this movement, not a few also refuse. Therefore, this study aims to analyze public sentiment towards #KawalPutusanMK hashtags on social media X (Twitter), using a netnography approach and big data analysis. The #KawalPutusanMK movement emerged in response to the DPR's efforts to revise the Constitutional Court's (MK) decision regarding the 2024 Regional Elections, which sparked controversy among the public. The research data was taken from conversations that occurred on platform X between August 21 and September 29, 2024. The results of the analysis showed that there were 1127 tweets using the hashtag, with the following sentiment distribution: 91 positive, 484 negative, and 552 neutral. The dominance of negative sentiment indicates public dissatisfaction with the Constitutional Court's decision. This research contributes to understanding political communication patterns on social media and provides insights for the government in monitoring public opinion and formulating more responsive policies.
Andriyendi, D. O., Nurman, S., & Dewi, S. F. (2023). Media sosial dan pengaruhnya terhadap partisipasi politik pemilih pemula pada Pilkada. Journal of Education, Cultural and Politics, 3(1), 101–111.
Anggraeni, D. M., & Sunarso, S. (2022). Persepsi tentang kampanye politik melalui media sosial dan partisipasi politik pemilih pemula pada Pilkada Kabupaten Sleman tahun 2020. AGORA, 11(3), 272–283.
Budiyono, M. (2016). Media Sosial Dan Komunikasi Politik: Media Sosial Sebagai Komunikasi Politik Menjelang Pilkada Dki Jakarta 2017. Jurnal Komunikasi, 11(1), 47–62.
Daherman, Y., & Taufiq, I. (2023). Positive Trend Correlation of Jokowi’s Social Media Exposure Regarding The Electability of# probowopresiden2024. Ultimacomm: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 15(2), 154–165.
Efriza, P. E. (2012). Sebuah Kajian Ilmu Politik. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Greene, J. O. (2013). Message production: Advances in communication theory. Routledge.
Gunanto, D. (2020). Tinjauan kritis politik dinasti di Indonesia. Sawala: Jurnal Administrasi Negara, 8(2), 177–191.
Hasmawati, F., & Aliasan, A. (2022). Strategi Komunikasi Dalam Manajemen Pengembangan Organisasi. Yonetim: Jurnal Manajemen Dakwah, 5(2), 42–50.
Khristianto, K. (2020). Persepsi Publik Terhadap Tokoh Politik Dalam Debat Politik Di Kanal Youtube. PRASASTI: Journal of Linguistics, 5(2), 176–188.
Kozinets, R. V. (2015). Netnography: Redefined. Sage. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118767771.wbiedcs067
Nimmo, D. D. (1978). Political communication and public opinion in America. (No Title).
Sarihati, T., Si, M., Luthfie, H. M., Kurniadi, B., & Si, M. (2022). Komunikasi Politik, Media Massa dan Opini Publik. PT. RajaGrafindo Persada-Rajawali Pers.
Sholeha, N. A. H. (2024). Analisis Media Monitoring Brand Facetology pada Bulan Maret-April 2024 Menggunakan Analysis Tools Brand24. Madani: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin, 2(5).
Timbowo, D. (2016). Manfaat Penggunaan Smartphone Sebagai Media Komunikasi (Studi pada Mahasiswa Jurusan Ilmu Komunikasi Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Politik Universitas Sam Ratulangi). Acta Diurna Komunikasi, 5(2).
Wismashanti, R. A. (2024). Komunikasi dalam Platform Online Crowdfunding: Tinjauan Literatur Sistematis. Technomedia Journal, 8(3), 50–63.
Zulqornain, J. A., Indriati, I., & Adikara, P. P. (2021). Analisis sentimen tanggapan masyarakat aplikasi tiktok menggunakan metode naïve bayes dan categorial propotional difference (cpd). Jurnal Pengembangan Teknologi Informasi Dan Ilmu Komputer, 5(7), 2886–2890.
