Comparative Study of C++ and C# Programming Languages
Main Article Content
This comparative study explores the similarities and differences between two widely-used programming languages: C++ and C#. While both languages are integral to modern software development, they cater to different development environments and paradigms. C++, a general-purpose programming language, is known for its performance efficiency and low-level memory management, making it ideal for system software, embedded systems, and performance-critical applications. In contrast, C#, a high-level language developed by Microsoft, is primarily used in the .NET ecosystem for building Windows applications, web services, and enterprise solutions. This study examines various aspects of both languages, including syntax, memory management, performance, ease of use, and application domains. By analyzing these parameters, the paper aims to provide a comprehensive comparison that highlights the strengths and weaknesses of C++ and C# in different programming contexts. Additionally, the study discusses the role of both languages in modern development environments and their suitability for various types of projects. The findings suggest that while C++ remains the preferred choice for performance-sensitive applications, C# offers a more user-friendly environment for rapid application development, particularly in enterprise and web-based applications.
Bjarne Stroustrup. (2013). The C++ programming language (4th ed.). Addison-Wesley Professional.
Koedijk, L., & Oprescu, A. (2022). Finding significant differences in the energy consumption when comparing programming languages and programs. 2022 International Conference on ICT for Sustainability (ICT4S), 1–12.
Mossige, M., Gotlieb, A., & Meling, H. (2015). Testing robot controllers using constraint programming and continuous integration. Information and Software Technology, 57, 169–185.
Niermann, D., Doernbach, T., Petzoldt, C., Isken, M., & Freitag, M. (2023). Software framework concept with visual programming and digital twin for intuitive process creation with multiple robotic systems. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 82, 102536.
Ogala, J. O., & Ojie, D. V. (2020). Comparative analysis of c, c++, c# and java programming languages. GSJ, 8(5), 1899–1913.
Shoaib, M., Naveed, M. S., Sanjrani, A. A., & Ahmed, A. (2021). A comparative study of contemporary programming languages in implementation of classical algorithms. Journal of Information & Communication Technology (JICT), 14(1).
Solberg, V. S., Good, G. E., & Nord, D. (1994). Career search self-efficacy: Ripe for applications and intervention programming. Journal of Career Development, 21, 63–72.
Tariq, M. U., Bashir, M. B., Babar, M., & Sohail, A. (2020). Code readability management of high-level programming languages: a comparative study. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 11(3).
Zhan, Z., He, W., Yi, X., & Ma, S. (2022). Effect of unplugged programming teaching aids on children’s Computational Thinking and classroom interaction: with respect to piaget’s four stages theory. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 07356331211057143.
